Artificial Data Example 1

MOST practice decision-making

Example 1: Pediatric obesity

Download Files

If you are interested in practicing fitting the ANOVA models, constructing interaction plots, and deciding which components to include in the hypothetical intervention, follow steps 1 –6 of the instructions below.

If you are interested only in practicing the decision-making process, skip steps (1) – (4), and begin on step 5.

Instructions

  1. Read the description of the experiment provided below.
  2. Download the artificial data set and import the data into your preferred statistical software package (e.g. SPSS, STATA).
  3. Estimate the ANOVA model, including main effects and interactions.
  4. Construct any interaction plots that may be useful in the decision-making process.
  5. Use the ANOVA output and relevant interaction plots to practice the decision-making process (you can use the file provided if you wish to skip steps 1—4).
  6. Check the answer key file to determine whether you chose one of the best combinations of components and component levels to build your hypothetical intervention.

Description of pediatric obesity example

A pediatric obesity researcher is interested in developing an intervention for families in which a child is obese.  The researcher wishes to estimate the effects of five intervention components:

  1. VEG, aimed at increasing a child’s vegetable intake;
  2. ACT, aimed at increasing family physical activity levels;
  3. EDU, nutritional education for parents and children;
  4. DIN, aimed at increasing the frequency of homemade dinners;
  5. CHK, a home visit in which the nutritional habits of the household are reviewed and suggestions are made for healthier eating.

The researcher decides to use a 25 factorial design for the experiment, N=256.  The first four factors correspond to the first four components.  Each has 2 levels: yes (the family is provided with the component, coded 1 in the data set) and no (the family is not provided with the component, coded -1).  The 5th factor corresponds to CHK, and has the following 2 levels: minimal (home visits occur once/month, coded -1 in the data set) and intensive (home visits occur biweekly, coded 1).  The outcome variable is percent change from pretest to posttest in the child’s body mass index (BMI).