Donna Shelley

Professor of Public Health Policy and Management

Co-Director of the Global Center for Implementation Science

Professional overview

Dr. Shelley is a tenured Professor in the Department of Public Health Policy and Management and the founding Co-Director of the Global Center for Implementation Science at the NYU School of Global Public Health. She conducts translational, population-based, and policy-relevant research that aims to accelerate dissemination and implementation of tobacco use treatment in safety net health care delivery systems and implementation of tobacco control policies. This research has been funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the New York State Department of Health.

Dr. Shelley’s implementation research focuses on building the evidence for effective theory-driven strategies that target barriers to implementation and sustainability of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in primary care settings in the U.S. and Viet Nam. Her research is also addressing the growing dual burden of noncommunicable and communicable diseases in LMICs and, specifically, the health impact on people living with HIV/AIDS.  Her policy research includes a completed NCI-funded study that evaluated the impact of the US federally mandated smoke-free public housing policy on exposure to secondhand smoke and explored the implementation process to identify strategies with the potential to improve the process and maximize public health impact.

Education

BS, University of Pennsylvania, PA

MD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY

MPH, Health Policy and Management, Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health, NY

Areas of research and study

Health Systems Strengthening

Implementation science

Tobacco Cessation

Tobacco Policy

Current Research

Policy

Purtle J, Moucheraud C, Yang LH, Shelley D. Four very basic ways to think about policy in implementation science. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 12;4(1):11

Shelley D. Kyriakas C, McNeill A, Murray R, Nilan K, Sherman SE, Raw M. Challenges to implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control guidelines on tobacco cessation treatment: a qualitative analysis. Addiction. 2020;115:527-533

Thorpe L, Anastasiou E, Wyka K, Tovar A, Gill E, Rule A, Elbel B, Kaplan SA, Jiang N, Gordon T, Shelley D. Evaluation of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in New York City Public Housing After Implementation of the 2018 Federal Smoke-Free Housing Policy. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024385

Tobacco cessation 

Hoang THL … Shelley D. Factors Influencing Tobacco Smoking and Cessation Among People Living  with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis. AIDS and Behavior. 2024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04279-1

Shelley et al. WHO Knowledge Summary: Tobacco and HIV https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/378509/9789240096868-eng.pdf

Ostroff JS, Shelley DR, Chichester LA, King JC, Li Y, Schofield E, Ciupek A, Criswell A, Acharya R, Banerjee SC, Elkin EB, Lynch K, Weiner BJ, Orlow I, Martin CM, Chan SV, Frederico V, Camille P, Holland S, Kenney J. Study protocol of a multiphase optimization strategy trial (MOST) for delivery of smoking cessation treatment in lung cancer screening settings. Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):664.

Health systems improvement and Implementation Science

Nwaozuru U, Murphy P, Richard A, …Shelley D, Airhihenbuwa C, Ogedegbe G, Ezechi O, Iwelunmor J. The sustainability of health interventions implemented in Africa: an updated systematic review on evidence and future research perspectives. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 8;6(1):39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980204/ 

Gaeta Gazzola M, Torsiglieri A, Velez L, Blaufarb S, Hernandez P, O'Grady MA, Blackburn J, Florick J, Cleland CM, Shelley D, Doran KM A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209533. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209533. Epub 2024 Oct 9.PMID: 39389548

Kilbourne AM, Geng E, Eshun-Wilson I, Sweeney S, Shelley D, Cohen DJ, Kirchner JE, Fernandez ME, Parchman ML. How does facilitation in healthcare work? Using mechanism mapping to illuminate the black box of a meta-implementation strategy. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 May 16;4(1):53. 

Parascandola M, Neta G, Salloum RG, Shelley D, Rositch AF.JCO Glob Oncol. Role of Local Evidence in Transferring Evidence-Based Interventions to Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings: Application to Global Cancer Prevention and Control.2022 Aug;8:e2200054.

Shelley D, Alvarez GG, Nguyen T, Nguyen N, Goldsamt L, Cleland C, Tozan Y, Shuter J, Armstrong-Hough M. Adapting a tobacco cessation treatment intervention and implementation strategies to enhance implementation effectiveness and clinical outcomes in the context of HIV care in Vietnam: a case study. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 17;3(1):112. 

Shelley D, Wang VH, Taylor K, Williams R, Toll B, Rojewski A, Foley KL, Rigotti N, Ostroff JS. Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice. Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083.

Shelley D, Cleland CM, Nguyen T, VanDevanter N, Siman N, Van Minh H, Nguyen N. Nicotine Tob Res. Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Strategy for Implementing Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Use in Vietnam Commune Health Centers 2022 Feb 1;24(2):196-203.

Hennein R, Ggita J, Ssuna B, Shelley D, Akiteng AR, Davis JL, Katamba A, Armstrong-Hough M. Implementation, interrupted: Identifying and leveraging factors that sustain after a programme interruption. Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug-Sep;17(9):1868-1882

Publications

Publications

“We’re almost guests in their clinical care” : Inpatient provider attitudes toward chronic disease management

Blecker, S., Meisel, T., Dickson, V. V., Shelley, D., & Horwitz, L. I. (n.d.).

Publication year

2017

Journal title

Journal of hospital medicine

Volume

12

Issue

3

Page(s)

162-167

10.12788/jhm.2699

Abstract

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients have at least 1 chronic disease that is not optimally controlled. The purpose of this study was to explore inpatient provider attitudes about chronic disease management and, in particular, barriers and facilitators of chronic disease management in the hospital. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of semi-structured interviews of 31 inpatient providers from an academic medical center. We interviewed attending physicians, resident physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners from various specialties about attitudes, experiences with, and barriers and facilitators towards chronic disease management in the hospital. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Providers perceived that hospitalizations offer an opportunity to improve chronic disease management, as patients are evaluated by a new care team and observed in a controlled environment. Providers perceived clinical benefits to in-hospital chronic care, including improvements in readmission and length of stay, but expressed concerns for risks related to adverse events and distraction from the acute problem. Barriers included provider lack of comfort with managing chronic diseases, poor communication between inpatient and outpatient providers, and hospital-system focus on patient discharge. A strong relationship with the outpatient provider and involvement of specialists were facilitators of inpatient chronic disease management. CONCLUSIONS: Providers perceived benefits to in-hospital chronic disease management for both processes of care and clinical outcomes. Efforts to increase inpatient chronic disease management will need to overcome barriers in multiple domains.

CHARTing a Path to Pragmatic Tobacco Treatment Research

Cruvinel, E., Richter, K. P., Stoney, C., Duffy, S., Fellows, J., Harrington, K. F., Rigotti, N. A., Sherman, S., Tindle, H. A., Shireman, T. I., Shelley, D., Waiwaiole, L., & Cummins, S. (n.d.).

Publication year

2016

Journal title

American journal of preventive medicine

Volume

51

Issue

4

Page(s)

630-636

10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.025

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction It is important to consider the degree to which studies are explanatory versus pragmatic to understand the implications of their findings for patients, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. Pragmatic trials test the effectiveness of interventions in real-world conditions; explanatory trials test for efficacy under ideal conditions. The Consortium of Hospitals Advancing Research on Tobacco (CHART) is a network of seven NIH-funded trials designed to identify effective programs that can be widely implemented in routine clinical practice. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of CHART trial study designs was conducted to place each study on the pragmatic-explanatory continuum. After reliability training, six raters independently scored each CHART study according to ten PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) dimensions, which covered participant eligibility criteria, intervention flexibility, practitioner expertise, follow-up procedures, participant compliance, practitioner adherence, and outcome analyses. Means and SDs were calculated for each dimension of each study, with lower scores representing more pragmatic elements. Results were plotted on “spoke and wheel” diagrams. The rating process and analyses were performed in October 2014 to September 2015. Results All seven CHART trials tended toward the pragmatic end of the spectrum, although there was a range from 0.76 (SD=0.23) to 1.85 (SD=0.58). Most studies included some explanatory design elements. Conclusions CHART findings should be relatively applicable to clinical practice. Funders and reviewers could integrate PRECIS criteria into their guidelines to better facilitate pragmatic research. CHART study protocols, coupled with scores reported here, may help readers improve the design of their own pragmatic trials.

Homelessness and other social determinants of health among emergency department patients

Doran, K. M., Kunzler, N. M., Mijanovich, T., Lang, S. W., Rubin, A., Testa, P. A., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2016

Journal title

Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

Volume

25

Issue

2

Page(s)

71-77

10.1080/10530789.2016.1237699

Abstract

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are often called the ‘safety net’ of the U.S. health care system. Little is known, however, about the social determinants of health (SDOH)–including rates and types of homelessness–of ED patients. This study sought to quantify the presence of housing instability, homelessness, and other selected SDOH in ED patients. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 625 patients presenting to an urban ED. 13.8% of patients were currently living in a homeless shelter or on the streets. Further, 25.4% of patients reported concern about becoming homeless in the next 2 months and 9.1% had been evicted in the past year. 42.0% of patients reported difficulty meeting essential expenses and 35.9% were worried about running out of food. In conclusion, we found high rates of homelessness and other social needs in ED patients. Addressing patients’ SDOH will become increasingly important under new healthcare payment models.

Readiness of Lung Cancer Screening Sites to Deliver Smoking Cessation Treatment : Current Practices, Organizational Priority, and Perceived Barriers

Shelley, D., Ostroff, J. S., Copeland, A., Li, Y., Shelley, D. S., & Henschke, C. I. (n.d.).

Publication year

2016

Journal title

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volume

18

Issue

5

Page(s)

1067-1075

10.1093/ntr/ntv177

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer screening represents an opportunity to deliver smoking cessation advice and assistance to current smokers. However, the current tobacco treatment practices of lung cancer screening sites are unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe organizational priority, current practice patterns, and barriers for delivery of evidence-based tobacco use treatment across lung cancer screening sites within the United States. Methods: Guided by prior work examining readiness of health care providers to deliver tobacco use treatment, we administered a brief online survey to a purposive national sample of site coordinators from 93 lung cancer screening sites. Results: Organizational priority for promoting smoking cessation among lung cancer screening enrollees was high. Most sites reported that, at the initial visit, patients are routinely asked about their current smoking status (98.9%) and current smokers are advised to quit (91.4%). Fewer (57%) sites provide cessation counseling or refer smokers to a quitline (60.2%) and even fewer (36.6%) routinely recommend cessation medications. During follow-up screening visits, respondents reported less attention to smoking cessation advice and treatment. Lack of patient motivation and resistance to cessation advice and treatment, lack of staff training, and lack of reimbursement were the most frequently cited barriers for delivering smoking cessation treatment. Conclusions: Although encouraging that lung cancer screening sites endorsed the importance of smoking cessation interventions, greater attention to identifying and addressing barriers for tobacco treatment delivery is needed in order to maximize the potential benefit of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening protocols. Implications: This study is the first to describe practice patterns, organizational priority, and barriers for delivery of smoking cessation treatment in a national sample of lung cancer screening sites.

Smoking-Cessation Interventions for Urban Hospital Patients : A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Sherman, S. E., Link, A. R., Rogers, E. S., Krebs, P., Ladapo, J. A., Shelley, D., Fang, Y., Wang, B., & Grossman, E. (n.d.).

Publication year

2016

Journal title

American journal of preventive medicine

Volume

51

Issue

4

Page(s)

566-577

10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.023

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction Hospitalization is a unique opportunity for smoking cessation, but prior interventions have measured efficacy with narrowly defined populations. The objective of this study was to enroll smokers admitted to two “safety net” hospitals and compare the effectiveness of two post-discharge cessation interventions. Design A randomized comparative effectiveness trial was conducted. Setting/participants At two New York City public hospitals, every hospitalized patient identified as a smoker (based on admission records) was approached. Inclusion criteria were: smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days; spoke English, Spanish, or Mandarin; had a U.S. phone number; not discharged to an institution where follow-up or smoking was limited; and not pregnant/breastfeeding. Of 18,797 patients identified as current smokers between July 2011 and April 2014, a total of 3,047 (16%) were discharged before being approached, 3,273 (17%) were not current smokers, 4,026 (21%) had no U.S. phone number, 2,831 (15%) were ineligible for other reasons, and 3,983 (21%) refused participation. In total, 1,618 (9%) participants enrolled in the study. During follow-up, 69% of participants were reached at 2 months and 68% at 6 months. Intervention At discharge, participants were randomized to multisession telephone counseling from study staff (n=804) or referral to the state quitline for proactive outreach and counseling (n=814). Main outcome measures Self-reported abstinence at 6 months was measured. Analyses were conducted in late 2015. Results One quarter of participants were homeless or in unstable housing, 60% had a history of substance abuse, 43% reported current hazardous drinking, and half had a psychiatric diagnosis other than substance abuse. At follow-up, the rate of abstinence (30-day point prevalence) was higher in the intensive counseling arm than the quitline arm at 2 months (29.0% vs 20.7%; relative risk=1.40; 95% CI=1.13, 1.73) and 6 months (37.4% vs 31.5%; relative risk=1.19; 95% CI=1.01, 1.40). Conclusions Intensive counseling was more effective than referral to the state quitline. Long-term abstinence was excellent in both groups. Many patients were not eligible for enrollment despite minimal exclusion criteria. Trial Registration This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01363245.

Testing the use of practice facilitation in a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design trial to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines : HealthyHearts NYC

Shelley, D., Ogedegbe, G., Anane, S., Wu, W. Y., Goldfeld, K., Gold, H. T., Kaplan, S., & Berry, C. (n.d.).

Publication year

2016

Journal title

Implementation Science

Volume

11

Issue

1

10.1186/S13012-016-0450-2

Abstract

Abstract

Background: HealthyHearts NYC (HHNYC) will evaluate the effectiveness of practice facilitation as a quality improvement strategy for implementing the Million Hearts' ABCS treatment guidelines for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) among high-risk patients who receive care in primary care practices in New York City. ABCS refers to (A) aspirin in high-risk individuals; (B) blood pressure control; (C) cholesterol management; and (S) smoking cessation. The long-term goal is to create a robust infrastructure for implementing and disseminating evidence-based practice guidelines (EBPG) in primary care practices. Methods/design: We are using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the implementation process and the impact of practice facilitation (PF) versus usual care on ABCS outcomes in 250 small primary care practices. Randomization is at the practice site level, all of which begin as part of the control condition. The intervention consists of one year of PF that includes a combination of one-on-one onsite visits and shared learning across practice sites. PFs will focus on helping sites implement evidence-based components of patient-centered medical home (PCMH) and the chronic care model (CCM), which include decision support, provider feedback, self-management tools and resources, and linkages to community-based services. Discussion: We hypothesize that practice facilitation will result in superior clinical outcomes compared to usual care; that the effects of practice facilitation will be mediated by greater adoption of system changes in accord with PCMH and CCM; and that there will be increased adaptive reserve and change capacity.

A Culturally Adapted Smoking Cessation Intervention for Korean Americans : A Mediating Effect of Perceived Family Norm Toward Quitting

Kim, S. S., Fang, H., Kwon, S., Shelley, D., & Ziedonis, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Volume

17

Issue

4

Page(s)

1120-1129

10.1007/s10903-014-0045-4

Abstract

Abstract

Korean men and women have the highest current smoking rates across all Asian ethnic subgroups in the United States. This is a 2-arm randomized controlled study of a culturally adapted smoking cessation intervention. The experimental condition received eight weekly 40-min individualized counseling sessions that incorporated Korean-specific cultural elements, whereas the control condition received eight weekly 10-min individualized counseling sessions that were not culturally adapted. All participants also received nicotine patches for 8 weeks. One-hundred nine Korean immigrants (91 men and 18 women) participated in the study. The rate of biochemically verified 12-month prolonged abstinence was significantly higher for the experimental condition than the control condition (38.2 vs. 11.1 %, χ2 = 10.7, p < 0.01). Perceived family norm significantly mediated the effect of cessation intervention on abstinence. Smoking cessation intervention for Korean Americans should be culturally adapted and involve family members to produce a long-term treatment effect.

An exploration of online behaviors and social media use among hookah and electronic-cigarette users

Link, A. R., Cawkwell, P. B., Shelley, D., & Sherman, S. E. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Addictive Behaviors Reports

Volume

2

Page(s)

37-40

10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.006

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between social norms and attitudes towards ENDS and hookah and use of these products. Methods: We conducted surveys with hookah and ENDS users who regularly used the Internet and social media and analyzed the primary social media account (e.g. Facebook) of each participant, coding all references to nicotine or tobacco products. The survey included domains on perceived favorability, perceived vulnerability and subjective norms. Results: We surveyed 21 ENDS users and 20 hookah users. Both groups used the Internet to look up information about their respective tobacco product (95% for hookah vs. 90% for ENDS). Seventy percent of hookah users had references to hookah on their social media profiles while 43% of ENDS users had references to ENDS on their page. The majority of both groups were exposed to content posted by friends in their social media network about their respective products online. Those who posted on social media about hookah and those who read about ENDS online had lower perceived vulnerability to the health risks associated with tobacco products. Conclusions: Hookah and ENDS users actively use the Internet and social media to obtain and share information about nicotine/tobacco products. Study participants who use hookah were more likely to share photos and discuss hookah related activities via social media than those who use ENDS. Social networks also represent valuable and untapped potential resources for communicating with this group about risks and harm reduction related to emerging nicotine/tobacco products.

Correlates of adherence to varenicline among HIV+ smokers

Shelley, D., Tseng, T. Y., Gonzalez, M., Krebs, P., Wong, S., Furberg, R., Sherman, S., Schoenthaler, A., Urbina, A., & Cleland, C. M. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volume

17

Issue

8

Page(s)

968-974

10.1093/ntr/ntv068

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Low rates of adherence to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy may limit the effectiveness of treatment. However, few studies have examined adherence in smoking cessation trials thus, there is a limited understanding of factors that influence adherence behaviors. This brief report analyzes correlates of adherence to varenicline among people living with HIV/AIDS. Methods: Study participants were recruited from three HIV care centers in New York City and enrolled in a three-arm randomized controlled pilot study in which all subjects received varenicline. At the 1-month study visit, there were no significant differences in adherence by study condition, therefore we combined treatment arms to examine correlates of adherence (n = 127). We used pill counts to assess varenicline adherence, defined as taking at least 80% of the prescribed dose. We conducted a multivariate path analysis to assess factors proposed by the informationmotivation-behavioral skills model to predict adherence. Results: Only 56% of smokers were at least 80% adherent to varenicline at 1 month. Adherencerelated information, self-efficacy, a college degree, and non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity were associated with increased varenicline adherence. In path analysis, information and motivation were associated with increased adherence self-efficacy, and adherence self-efficacy was associated with increased adherence, but with marginal significance. These associations with adherence were no longer significant after controlling for race/ethnicity and education. Conclusions: Further exploration of the role of a modifiable correlates of adherence, such as adherencerelated information, motivation and self-efficacy is warranted. Interventions are needed that can address disparities in these and other psychosocial factors that may mediate poor medication adherence.

Formative Evaluation of a Text Messaging Intervention to Promote Varenicline Adherence among Tobacco-Dependent Persons with HIV

Krebs, P., Tseng, T. Y., Pham, H., Wong, S., Sherman, S. E., Shelley, D., Furberg, R. D., & Wolfe, H. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Journal of Health Communication

Volume

20

Issue

9

Page(s)

1021-1025

10.1080/10810730.2015.1018595

Abstract

Abstract

Few published studies describe processes in the development of mobile health interventions. This study reports data from a formative evaluation of a text messaging intervention being developed to increase adherence to smoking cessation medication (varenicline) among tobacco-dependent persons with HIV/AIDS. Four focus groups were conducted (N = 29) using a mixed-methods approach to assess: (a) beliefs and preferences regarding the use of varenicline, (b) preferences for receiving tobacco-related texts, and (c) the acceptability of draft text messages. Themes that emerged from the focus groups were that (a) participants were cautious and wanted to discuss varenicline carefully with health care providers, (b) participants preferred simple messages that were positive and encouraging, (c) messages should emphasize tobacco cessation and not varenicline adherence, and (d) texts would serve as a reminder about goals and foster support and connectedness with the health care team. Overall, 47 out of the 100 messages received a grade of C or less (rated on a 5-point grade scale: A, B, C, D, or F), the majority of which focused on medication adherence. All participants reported that they were likely to read the messages. The majority (64%) indicated that they preferred receiving 2 or more messages per day. Gathering systematic participant feedback provides critical input in intervention planning.

Implementing tobacco use treatment guidelines in community health centers in Vietnam

Shelley, D., VanDevanter, N., Cleland, C. C., Nguyen, L., & Nguyen, N. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Implementation Science

Volume

10

Issue

1

10.1186/s13012-015-0328-8

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Vietnam has a smoking prevalence that is the second highest among Southeast Asian countries (SEACs). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), most reductions in mortality from tobacco use in the near future will be achieved through helping current users quit. Yet, largely due to a lack of research on strategies for implementing WHO-endorsed treatment guidelines in primary care settings, services to treat tobacco dependence are not readily available to smokers in low middle-income countries (LMICs) like Vietnam. The objective of this study is to conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of two system-level strategies for implementing evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of tobacco use in 26 public community health centers (CHCs) in Vietnam. Methods/Design: The current study will use a cluster-randomized design and multiple data sources (patient exit interviews, provider and village health worker (VHW) surveys, and semi-structured provider/VHW interviews) to study the process of adapting and implementing clinical practice guidelines in Vietnam and theory-driven mechanisms hypothesized to explain the comparative effectiveness of the two strategies for implementation. CHCs will be randomly assigned to either of the following: (1) training plus clinical reminder system (TC) or (2) TC + referral to a VHW (TCR) for three in person counseling sessions. The primary outcome is provider adherence to tobacco use treatment guidelines. The secondary outcome is 6-month biochemically verified smoking abstinence. Discussion: The proposed implementation strategies draw on evidence-based approaches and a growing literature that supports the effectiveness of integrating community health workers as members of the health care team to improve access to preventive services. We hypothesize that the value of these implementation strategies is additive and that incorporating a referral resource that allows providers to delegate the task of offering counseling (TCR) will be superior to TC alone in improving delivery of cessation assistance to smokers. The findings of this research have potential to guide large-scale adoption of promising strategies for implementing and disseminating tobacco use treatment guidelines throughout the public health system in Vietnam and will serve as a model for similar action in other LMICs.

Toward Implementing Primary Care at Chairside : Developing a Clinical Decision Support System for Dental Hygienists

Russell, S. L., Greenblatt, A. P., Gomes, D., Birenz, S., Golembeski, C. A., Shelley, D., McGuirk, M., Eisenberg, E., & Northridge, M. E. (n.d.).

Publication year

2015

Journal title

Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice

Volume

15

Issue

4

Page(s)

145-151

10.1016/j.jebdp.2015.08.003

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction The goal of this project was to use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as the theoretical foundation for developing a web-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for primary care screening and care coordination by dental hygienists at chairside. Methods First, we appraised New York State education and scope of practice requirements for dental hygienists with input from health experts who constituted a Senior Advisory Board for the project, and reviewed current professional guidelines and best practices for tobacco use, hypertension and diabetes screening, and nutrition counseling at chairside. Second, we created algorithms for these four health issues (tobacco, hypertension, diabetes, and nutrition) using evidence-based guidelines endorsed by authoritative professional bodies. Third, an information technology specialist incorporated the algorithms into a tool using an iterative process to refine the CDSS, with input from dental hygienists, dentists, Senior Advisory Board members and research staff. Results An evidence-based CDSS for use by dental hygienists at chairside for tobacco use, hypertension and diabetes screening, and nutrition counseling was developed with the active participation of the individuals involved in the implementation process. Conclusions CDSS technology may potentially be leveraged to enhance primary care screening and coordination by dental hygienists at chairside, leading to improved patient care. Using the CFIR as a pragmatic structure for implementing this intervention across multiple settings, the developed CDSS is available for downloading and adaptation to diverse dental settings and other primary care sensitive conditions.

Barriers and facilitators to expanding the role of community health workers to include smoking cessation services in Vietnam : A qualitative analysis

Shelley, D., Nguyen, L., Pham, H., VanDevanter, N., & Nguyen, N. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

BMC health services research

Volume

14

Issue

1

10.1186/s12913-014-0606-1

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Despite high smoking rates, cessation services are largely unavailable in Vietnam. This study explored attitudes and beliefs of community health workers (CHWs) towards expanding their role to include delivering tobacco use treatment (TUT), and potential barriers and facilitators associated with implementing a strategy in which health centers would refer patients to CHWs for cessation services. Methods: We conducted four focus groups with 29 CHWs recruited from four district community health centers (CHCs) in Hanoi, Vietnam. Results: Participants supported expanding their role saying that it fit well with their current responsibilities. They further endorsed the feasibility of serving as a referral resource for providers in local CHCs expressing the belief that CHWs were "more suitable than their clinical colleagues" to offer cessation assistance. The most frequently cited barrier to routinely offering cessation services was that despite enacting a National Tobacco Control Action plan, cessation is not one of the national prevention priorities. As a result, CHWs have not been "assigned" to help smokers quit by the Ministry of Health. Additional barriers included lack of training and time constraints. Conclusion: Focus groups suggest that implementing a systems-level intervention that allows providers to refer smokers to CHWs is a promising model for extending the treatment of tobacco use beyond primary care settings and increasing access to smoking cessation services in Vietnam. There is a need to test the cost-effectiveness of this and other strategies for implementing TUT guidelines to support and inform national tobacco control policies in Vietnam and other low-and middle-income countries.

Barriers to dental services for older adults

Montini, T., Tseng, T. Y., Patel, H., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volume

38

Issue

5

Page(s)

781-788

10.5993/AJHB.38.5.15

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To explore barriers to older adults' accessing dental care. Methods: We performed oral exams on 184 community-dwelling older adults; those who needed dental care were contacted 6-12 weeks later to determine if they were able to access treatment. Those who could not access care were interviewed regarding barriers. Results: Of those examined, 89% needed dental treatment. After 6 weeks, 52% had received treatment, 48% had not. Those unable to access treatment had fewer teeth, were more likely to be referred regarding dentures, and were less likely to have a dentist. Reasons cited for not accessing care among the 35 participants we interviewed included a lack of finances, transportation, or assistance in navigating dental service. Conclusions: Older adults have a high burden of oral disease and access barriers remain.

Changing the research landscape : The New York City clinical data research network

Kaushal, R., Hripcsak, G., Ascheim, D. D., Bloom, T., Campion, T. R., Caplan, A. L., Currie, B. P., Check, T., Deland, E. L., Gourevitch, M. N., Hart, R., Horowitz, C. R., Kastenbaum, I., Levin, A. A., Low, A. F., Meissner, P., Mirhaji, P., Pincus, H. A., Scaglione, C., … Tobin, J. N. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volume

21

Issue

4

Page(s)

587-590

10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002764

Abstract

Abstract

The New York City Clinical Data Research Network (NYC-CDRN), funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), brings together 22 organizations including seven independent health systems to enable patient-centered clinical research, support a national network, and facilitate learning healthcare systems. The NYC-CDRN includes a robust, collaborative governance and organizational infrastructure, which takes advantage of its participants' experience, expertise, and history of collaboration. The technical design will employ an information model to document and manage the collection and transformation of clinical data, local institutional staging areas to transform and validate data, a centralized data processing facility to aggregate and share data, and use of common standards and tools. We strive to ensure that our project is patient-centered; nurtures collaboration among all stakeholders; develops scalable solutions facilitating growth and connections; chooses simple, elegant solutions wherever possible; and explores ways to streamline the administrative and regulatory approval process across sites.

Dentists United to Extinguish Tobacco (DUET) : A study protocol for a cluster randomized, controlled trial for enhancing implementation of clinical practice guidelines for treating tobacco dependence in dental care settings

Ostroff, J. S., Li, Y., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

Implementation Science

Volume

9

Issue

1

10.1186/1748-5908-9-25

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Although dental care settings provide an exceptional opportunity to reach smokers and provide brief cessation advice and treatment to reduce oral and other tobacco-related health conditions, dental care providers demonstrate limited adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of tobacco use and dependence.Methods/Design: Guided by a multi-level, conceptual framework that emphasizes changes in provider beliefs and organizational characteristics as drivers of improvement in tobacco treatment delivery, the current protocol will use a cluster, randomized design and multiple data sources (patient exit interviews, provider surveys, site observations, chart audits, and semi-structured provider interviews) to study the process of implementing clinical practice guidelines for treating tobacco dependence in 18 public dental care clinics in New York City. The specific aims of this comparative-effectiveness research trial are to: compare the effectiveness of three promising strategies for implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines-staff training and current best practices (CBP), CBP + provider performance feedback (PF), and CBP + PF + provider reimbursement for delivery of tobacco cessation treatment (pay-for-performance, or P4P); examine potential theory-driven mechanisms hypothesized to explain the comparative effectiveness of three strategies for implementation; and identify baseline organizational factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based tobacco use treatment practices in dental clinics. The primary outcome is change in providers' tobacco treatment practices and the secondary outcomes are cost per quit, use of tobacco cessation treatments, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence.Discussion: We hypothesize that the value of these promising implementation strategies is additive and that incorporating all three strategies (CBP, PF, and P4P) will be superior to CBP alone and CBP + PF in improving delivery of cessation assistance to smokers. The findings will improve knowledge pertinent to the implementation, dissemination, and sustained utilization of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in dental practices.Trial registration: NCT01615237.

Dentists' self-perceived role in offering tobacco cessation services : Results from a nationally representative survey, United States, 2010-2011

Jannat-Khah, D. P., McNeely, J., Pereyra, M. R., Parish, C., Pollack, H. A., Ostroff, J., Metsch, L., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volume

11

Issue

11

10.5888/pcd11.140186

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction Dental visits represent an opportunity to identify and help patients quit smoking, yet dental settings remain an untapped venue for treatment of tobacco dependence. The purpose of this analysis was to assess factors that may influence patterns of tobacco-use-related practice among a national sample of dental providers. Methods We surveyed a representative sample of general dentists practicing in the United States (N = 1,802). Multivariable analysis was used to assess correlates of adherence to tobacco use treatment guidelines and to analyze factors that influence providers' willingness to offer tobacco cessation assistance if reimbursed for this service. Results More than 90% of dental providers reported that they routinely ask patients about tobacco use, 76% counsel patients, and 45% routinely offer cessation assistance, defined as referring patients for cessation counseling, providing a cessation prescription, or both. Results from multivariable analysis indicated that cessation assistance was associated with having a practice with 1 or more hygienists, having a chart system that includes a tobacco use question, having received training on treating tobacco dependence, and having positive attitudes toward treating tobacco use. Providers who did not offer assistance but who reported that they would change their practice patterns if sufficiently reimbursed were more likely to be in a group practice, treat patients insured through Medicaid, and have positive attitudes toward treating tobacco dependence. Conclusion Findings indicate the potential benefit of increasing training opportunities and promoting system changes to increase involvement of dental providers in conducting tobacco use treatment. Reimbursement models should be tested to assess the effect on dental provider practice patterns.

Factors influencing tobacco use treatment patterns among Vietnamese health care providers working in community health centers

Shelley, D., Tseng, T. Y., Pham, H., Nguyen, L., Keithly, S., Stillman, F., & Nguyen, N. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

BMC public health

Volume

14

Issue

1

10.1186/1471-2458-14-68

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Almost half of adult men in Viet Nam are current smokers, a smoking prevalence that is the second highest among South East Asian countries (SEAC). Although Viet Nam has a strong public health delivery system, according to the 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey, services to treat tobacco dependence are not readily available to smokers. The purpose of this study was to characterize current tobacco use treatment patterns among Vietnamese health care providers and factors influencing adherence to guideline recommended tobacco use screening and cessation interventions. Methods. A cross sectional survey of 134 health care providers including physicians, nurses, midwives, physician assistants and pharmacists working in 23 community health centers in Viet Nam. Results: 23% of providers reported screening patients for tobacco use, 33% offered advice to quit and less than 10% offered assistance to half or more of their patients in the past three months. Older age, attitudes, self-efficacy and normative beliefs were associated with screening for tobacco use. Normative beliefs were associated with offering advice to quit. However in the logistic regression analysis only normative beliefs remained significant for both screening and offering advice to quit. Over 90% of providers reported having never received training related to tobacco use treatment. Major barriers to treating tobacco use included lack of training, lack of referral resources and staff to support counseling, and lack of patient interest. Conclusions: Despite ratifying the FCTC, Viet Nam has not made progress in implementing policies and systems to ensure that smokers are receiving evidence-based treatment. This study suggests a need to change organizational norms through changes in national policies, training and local system-level changes that facilitate treatment.

Interprofessional education between dentistry and nursing : the NYU experience.

Haber, J., Spielman, A. I., Wolff, M., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

Journal of the California Dental Association

Volume

42

Issue

1

Page(s)

44-51

Abstract

Abstract

In 2005, New York University Colleges of Dentistry and Nursing formed an organizational partnership to create a unique model of interprofessional education, research, service and practice. This paper describes the first eight years of experience, from the early reaction of the public to the partnership, to examples of success and past and current challenges.

Same strategy different industry : Corporate influence on public policy

Shelley, D., Ogedegbe, G., & Elbel, B. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

American journal of public health

Volume

104

Issue

4

Page(s)

e9-e11

10.2105/AJPH.2013.301832

Abstract

Abstract

In March 2013 a state judge invalidated New York City's proposal to ban sales of sugar-sweetened beverages larger than 16 ounces; the case is under appeal. This setback was attributable in part to opposition from the beverage industry and racial/ethnic minority organizations they support. We provide lessons from similar tobacco industry efforts to block policies that reduced smoking prevalence. We offer recommendations that draw on the tobacco control movement's success in thwarting industry influence and promoting public health policies that hold promise to improve population health.

What's in a setting? : Influence of organizational culture on provider adherence to clinical guidelines for treating tobacco use

Hung, D. Y., Leidig, R., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2014

Journal title

Health Care Management Review

Volume

39

Issue

2

Page(s)

154-163

10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182914d11

Abstract

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Organizational culture is an important but underinvestigated feature of the work environment that can impact provider behavior, including adherence to clinical practice guidelines. There is substantial evidence that physician assistance to smokers can produce significant reductions in tobacco use. However, this evidence has not been well translated into practice, as only a small proportion of smokers receive recommended treatment during medical visits. PURPOSE:: This study examines organizational culture as a contextual feature of primary care clinics and its impact on adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treating tobacco use. METHODOLOGY:: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 500 primary care providers in 60 community clinics located in New York City. Relationships between provider adherence to "5A" clinical guidelines, as recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service, and both provider and organizational covariates were described. We used hierarchical linear modeling to examine the associations between clinic culture and provider treatment patterns. FINDINGS:: Providers in clinics with stronger "group/clan," "hierarchical," and "rational" culture types, as compared with a "developmental" culture, reported greater adherence to 5A guidelines (p < .05). System-level structures and care processes were positively associated (p < .01), whereas number of ongoing quality initiatives was negatively associated with 5A delivery (p < .05). Provider familiarity with guidelines (p < .01), confidence with cessation counseling (p < .05), and perceived effectiveness in helping smokers quit were associated with more frequent 5A intervention (p < .01). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:: Findings suggest that organizational culture can influence provider adherence to cessation treatment guidelines, even when controlling for other factors known to affect practice patterns. Specifically, cultures that emphasize human resources and performance standards are conducive to integrating 5A guidelines into routine practice. Understanding the role of organizational culture enables healthcare managers and practitioners to be strategic when implementing, and also sustaining, use of evidence-based guidelines.

Feasibility of a computerized clinical decision support system for treating tobacco use in dental clinics

Montini, T., Schenkel, A. B., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2013

Journal title

Journal of dental education

Volume

77

Issue

4

Page(s)

458-462

Abstract

Abstract

This study tested the feasibility of using information technology to improve dentists' adherence to the Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guidelines by offering a web-based computer-mediated clinical decision support system (CDSS) for tobacco use treatment in dental clinics. The authors developed a CDSS tool, deployed the software in one of New York University College of Dentistry's general practice clinics, interviewed associate student dentists, and reviewed a random selection of patients' charts to determine if, after implementation, there were changes in tobacco use screening and referral to treatment. Students reported that the CDSS was easy to use, increased their efficiency, and provided better quality of evidence than was available prior to the intervention. Chart reviews demonstrated that, after CDSS implementation, patients in the target clinic were significantly more likely to be screened for tobacco use (

Substance-use screening and interventions in dental practices : Survey of practice-based research network dentists regarding current practices, policies and barriers

McNeely, J., Wright, S., Matthews, A. G., Rotrosen, J., Shelley, D., Buchholz, M. P., & Curro, F. A. (n.d.).

Publication year

2013

Journal title

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volume

144

Issue

6

Page(s)

627-638

10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0174

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Dental visits represent an opportunity to identify and assist patients with unhealthy substance use, but little is known about how dentists are addressing patients' use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs. The authors surveyed dentists to learn about the role their practices might play in providing substance-use screening and interventions. Methods: The authors distributed a 41-item Web-based survey to all 210 dentists active in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network, a practice-based research network. The questionnaire assessed dental practices' policies and current practices, attitudes and perceived barriers to providing services for tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Results: One hundred forty-three dentists completed the survey (68 percent response rate). Although screening was common, fewer dentists reported that they were providing follow-up counseling or referrals for substance use. Insufficient knowledge or training was the most frequently cited barrier to intervention. Many dentists reported they would offer assistance for use of tobacco (67 percent) or alcohol or illicit drugs (52 percent) if reimbursed; respondents who treated publicly insured patients were more likely to reply that they would offer this assistance. Conclusions: Dentists recognize the importance of screening for substance use, but they lack the clinical training and practice-based systems focused on substance use that could facilitate intervention. Practical Implications: The results of this study indicate that dentists may be willing to address substance use among patients, including use of alcohol and illicit drugs in addition to tobacco, if barriers are reduced through changes in reimbursement, education and systems-level support.

Effectiveness of smoking-cessation interventions for urban hospital patients : study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Grossman, E., Shelley, D., Braithwaite, R. S., Lobach, I., Goffin, A., Rogers, E., & Sherman, S. (n.d.).

Publication year

2012

Journal title

Trials

Volume

13

10.1186/1745-6215-13-126

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Hospitalization may be a particularly important time to promote smoking cessation, especially in the immediate post-discharge period. However, there are few studies to date that shed light on the most effective or cost-effective methods to provide post-discharge cessation treatment, especially among low-income populations and those with a heavy burden of mental illness and substance use disorders.Methods/design: This randomized trial will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two approaches to smoking cessation treatment among patients discharged from two urban public hospitals in New York City. During hospitalization, staff will be prompted to ask about smoking and to offer nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on admission and at discharge. Subjects will be randomized on discharge to one of two arms: one arm will be proactive multi-session telephone counseling with motivational enhancement delivered by study staff, and the other will be a faxed or online referral to the New York State Quitline. The primary outcome is 30-day point-prevalence abstinence from smoking at 6-month follow-up post-discharge. We will also examine cost-effectiveness from a societal and a payer perspective, as well as explore subgroup analyses related to patient location of hospitalization, race/ethnicity, immigrant status, and inpatient diagnosis.Discussion: This study will explore issues of implementation feasibility in a post-hospitalization patient population, as well as add information about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different strategies for designing smoking cessation programs for hospitalized patients.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID# NCT01363245.

Feasibility of implementing rapid oral fluid HIV testing in an urban University Dental Clinic : a qualitative study

Hutchinson, M. K., VanDevanter, N., Phelan, J., Malamud, D., Vernillo, A., Combellick, J., & Shelley, D. (n.d.).

Publication year

2012

Journal title

BMC Oral Health

Volume

12

Issue

1

10.1186/1472-6831-12-11

Abstract

Abstract

Background: More than 1 million individuals in the U.S. are infected with HIV; approximately 20% of whom do not know they are infected. Early diagnosis of HIV infection results in earlier access to treatment and reductions in HIV transmission. In 2006, the CDC recommended that health care providers offer routine HIV screening to all adolescent and adult patients, regardless of community seroprevalence or patient lifestyle. Dental providers are uniquely positioned to implement these recommendations using rapid oral fluid HIV screening technology. However, thus far, uptake into dental practice has been very limited.Methods: The study utilized a qualitative descriptive approach with convenience samples of dental faculty and students. Six in-depth one-on-one interviews were conducted with dental faculty and three focus groups were conducted with fifteen dental students.Results: Results were fairly consistent and indicated relatively high levels of acceptability. Barriers and facilitators of oral fluid HIV screening were identified in four primary areas: scope of practice/practice enhancement, skills/knowledge/training, patient service/patient reactions and logistical issues.Conclusions: Oral fluid HIV screening was described as having benefits for patients, dental practitioners and the public good. Many of the barriers to implementation that were identified in the study could be addressed through training and interdisciplinary collaborations.