Jose Pagan
Jose Pagan
Scroll
Chair and Professor of the Department of Public Health Policy and Management
-
Professional overview
-
Dr. Pagán received his PhD in economics from the University of New Mexico and is a former Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar with expertise in health economics and population health. He has led research, implementation, and evaluation projects on the redesign of health care delivery and payment systems. He is interested in population health management, health care payment and delivery system reform, and the social determinants of health. Over the years his research has been funded through grants and contracts from the Department of Defense, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the European Commission, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, among others.
Dr. Pagán is Chair of the Board of Directors of NYC Health + Hospitals, the largest public healthcare system in the United States. He also served as Chair of the National Advisory Committee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Health Policy Research Scholars and was a member of the Board of Directors of the Interdisciplinary Association for Population Health Science and the American Society of Health Economists.
-
Areas of research and study
-
Applied EconomicsHealth EconomicsPopulation HealthPublic Health Policy
-
Publications
Publications
A quasi-experimental study of New York City's sodium warning regulation and hypertension prevalence, 2005–2020
Adolescent utilization of school based mental health services in the United States
Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for chronic kidney disease among the general population and adults with diabetes in China: a modelling study
Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition
Experiences of patient-provider concordance in healthcare among All of Us participants, 2017–2023
AbstractHolm, J., Cuevas, A., Wang, V. H. C., Pagán, J. A., & Silver, D. (n.d.).Publication year
2025Journal title
Patient Education and CounselingVolume
139AbstractObjective: To examine differences in care experiences and preferences related to patient-provider relationships across both cultural and personal patient identities. Methods: Logistic regression was used to test the associations between patient characteristics and patient survey responses using 2017–2023 data from the All of Us dataset. Results: Nearly two thirds of the All of Us participants considered it important that their providers were like them (63.2 %) and could often see them (66.3 %). The odds of reporting that it was important that their providers were like them were higher among all groups compared to non-Hispanic White participants (non-Hispanic Black: aOR 2.59 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [2.41–2.78]; Hispanic: aOR 1.42 95% CI [1.33–1.51]; non-Hispanic Asian: aOR 1.45 95% CI [1.33–1.59]; non-Hispanic Other: aOR 1.16 95% CI [1.08–1.25]). Female participants (aOR 1.29 95% CI [1.25–1.33]), those that spoke a language other than English at home (aOR 1.45 95% CI [1.38–1.53]), those with Medicaid (aOR 1.23 95% CI [1.15–1.32]) or no insurance (aOR 1.17 95% CI [1.10–1.25]) compared to those privately insured, and those with a disability (aOR 1.15 95% CI [1.11–1.20]) were more likely to report that it was very/somewhat important their provider be similar to them. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the dimensions of patient identity contribute to inequities in receiving culturally concordant care. Practice implications: The significant subgroup differences across all survey questions suggest that previous interventions addressing cultural competence in providers may not reach all the patient populations. Instead of a one-size-fits-all approach to improving the care experiences of different patient populations, adopting the key behaviors derived from both patient-centered and culturally competent care and by using the guiding principles of cultural humility would enable providers to tailor care that is centered on patient needs and preferences.Forging hospital and community partnerships to enable care coordination for opioid use disorder
Implementation Strategies to Enhance Safety-Net Hospitals’ Adoption of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
Need of the hour: A service failure recovery reorientation for U.S. hospitals
Population, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics associated with state preemption laws in the United States, 2009-2018
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Adolescent Utilization of School Based Mental Health Services
SpaCE: a spatial counterfactual explainable deep learning model for predicting out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcome
Violent crime victimization and mental health among adolescents in Mexico
Working from home is associated with lower odds of inflation stress Among employed US adults in the Household Pulse Survey
Barriers and Facilitators to Establishing Partnerships for Substance Use Disorder Care Transitions Between Safety-Net Hospitals and Community-Based Organizations
AbstractLindenfeld, Z., Franz, B., Lai, A., Pagan, J., Fenstemaker, C., Cronin, C. E., & Chang, J. E. (n.d.).Publication year
2024Journal title
Journal of general internal medicineVolume
39Issue
12Page(s)
2150-2159AbstractBackground: The effectiveness of hospital-based transitional opioid programs (TOPs), which aim to connect patients with substance use disorders (SUD) to ongoing treatment in the community following initiation of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment in the hospital, hinges on successful patient transitions. These transitions are enabled by strong partnerships between hospitals and community-based organizations (CBOs). However, no prior study has specifically examined barriers and facilitators to establishing SUD care transition partnerships between hospitals and CBOs. Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators to developing partnerships between hospitals and CBOs to facilitate care transitions for patients with SUDs. Design: Qualitative study using semi structured interviews conducted between November 2022-August 2023. Participants: Staff and providers from hospitals affiliated with four safety-net health systems (n=21), and leaders and staff from the CBOs with which they had established partnerships (n=5). Approach: Interview questions focused on barriers and facilitators to implementing TOPs, developing partnerships with CBOs, and successfully transitioning SUD patients from hospital settings to CBOs. Key Results: We identified four key barriers to establishing transition partnerships: policy and philosophical differences between organizations, ineffective communication, limited trust, and a lack of connectivity between data systems. We also identified three facilitators to partnership development: strategies focused on building partnership quality, strategic staffing, and organizing partnership processes. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that while multiple barriers to developing hospital-CBO partnerships exist, stakeholders can adopt implementation strategies that mitigate these challenges such as using mediators, cross-hiring, and focusing on mutually beneficial services, even within resource-limited safety-net settings. Policymakers and health system leaders who wish to optimize TOPs in their facilities should focus on adopting implementation strategies to support transition partnerships such as inadequate data collection and sharing systems.Cost-Associated Unmet Dental, Vision, And Hearing Needs Among Low-Income Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
Cost-Effectiveness of the Second COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in the USA
Discrimination in Medical Settings across Populations: Evidence From the All of Us Research Program
AbstractWang, V. H. C., Cuevas, A. G., Osokpo, O. H., Chang, J. E., Zhang, D., Hu, A., Yun, J., Lee, A., Du, S., Williams, D. R., & Pagán, J. A. (n.d.).Publication year
2024Journal title
American journal of preventive medicineVolume
67Issue
4Page(s)
568-580AbstractIntroduction: Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) contributes to healthcare disparities in the United States, but few studies have determined the extent of DMS in a large national sample and across different populations. This study estimated the national prevalence of DMS and described demographic and health-related characteristics associated with experiencing DMS in seven different situations. Methods: Survey data from 41,875 adults participating in the All of Us Research Program collected in 2021–2022 and logistic regression were used to examine the association between sociodemographic and health-related characteristics and self-reported DMS among adults engaged with a healthcare provider within the past 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed in 2023–2024. Results: About 36.89% of adults reported having experienced at least one DMS situation. Adults with relative social and medical disadvantages had higher prevalence of experiencing DMS. Compared to their counterparts, respondents with higher odds of experiencing DMS in at least one situation identified as female, non-Hispanic Black, having at least some college, living in the South, renter, having other living arrangement, being publicly insured, not having a usual source of care, having multiple chronic conditions, having any disability, and reporting fair or poor health, p<0.05. Conclusions: The findings indicate a high prevalence of DMS, particularly among some population groups. Characterizing DMS may be a valuable tool for identifying populations at risk within the healthcare system and optimizing the overall patient care experience. Implementing relevant policies remains an essential strategy for mitigating the prevalence of DMS and reducing healthcare disparities.Enrollment Patterns of Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries by Dental, Vision, and Hearing Benefits
AbstractGupta, A., Silver, D., Meyers, D. J., Murray, G., Glied, S., & Pagán, J. A. (n.d.).Publication year
2024Journal title
JAMA Health ForumVolume
5Issue
1Page(s)
E234936AbstractImportance: Most Medicare beneficiaries now choose to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. Racial and ethnic minority group and low-income beneficiaries are increasingly enrolling in MA plans. Objective: To examine whether dental, vision, and hearing supplemental benefits offered in MA plans are associated with the plan choices of traditionally underserved Medicare beneficiaries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This exploratory observational cross-sectional study used data from the 2018 to 2020 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey linked to MA plan benefits. The nationally representative sample comprised primarily community-dwelling MA beneficiaries enrolled in general enrollment MA plans. Data analysis was performed between April and October 2023. Exposures: Beneficiary self-identified race and ethnicity and combined individual and spouse income and educational attainment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Binary indicators were developed to determine whether beneficiaries were enrolled in a plan offering any dental, comprehensive dental, any vision, eyewear, any hearing, or hearing aid benefit. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were estimated to report average marginal effects adjusted for beneficiary-level demographic and health characteristics, plan attributes, and plan availability. Results: This study included 8139 (weighted N = 31 million) eligible MA beneficiaries, with a mean (SD) age of 77.7 (7.5) years. More than half of beneficiaries (54.9%) were women; 9.8% self-identified as Black, 2.0% as Hispanic, 83.9% as White, and 4.2% as other or multiple races or ethnicities. Plan choices by dental benefits were examined among 7516 beneficiaries who were not enrolled in any dental standalone plan, by vision benefits for 8026 beneficiaries not enrolled in any vision standalone plan, and by hearing benefits for 8131 beneficiaries not enrolled in any hearing standalone plan. Black beneficiaries were more likely to enroll in plans with any dental benefit (9.0 percentage points [95% CI, 3.4-14.4]; P <.001), any comprehensive dental benefit (11.2 percentage points [95% CI, 5.7-16.7]; P <.001), any eye benefit (3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 1.0 to 5.0]; P =.004), or any eyewear benefit (6.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.6-11.5]; P =.03) compared with White beneficiaries. Lower-income individuals (earning ≤200% of the federal poverty level) were more likely to enroll in a plan with a comprehensive dental benefit (4.4 percentage-point difference [95% CI, 0.1-7.9]; P =.01) compared with higher-income beneficiaries. Beneficiaries without a college degree were more likely to enroll in a plan with a comprehensive dental benefit (4.7 percentage-point difference [95% CI, 1.4-8.0]; P =.005) compared with those with higher educational attainment. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that racial and ethnic minority individuals and those with lower income or educational attainment are more likely to choose MA plans with dental or vision benefits. As the federal government prepares to adjust MA plan star ratings for health equity, implements MA payment cuts, and allows increasing flexibility in supplemental benefit offerings, these findings may inform benefit monitoring for MA..Examining the relationship between social determinants of health, measures of structural racism and county-level overdose deaths from 2017–2020
Global prevalence of violence against children and adolescents during COVID-19: A meta-analysis
Medical financial hardship between young adult cancer survivors and matched individuals without cancer in the United States
Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and County Social Vulnerability
Racial and ethnic differences in the receipt of continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
Rural-urban disparities in the availability of hospital-based screening, medications for opioid use disorder, and addiction consult services
AbstractFranz, B., Cronin, C. E., Lindenfeld, Z., Pagan, J. A., Lai, A. Y., Krawczyk, N., Rivera, B. D., & Chang, J. E. (n.d.).Publication year
2024Journal title
Journal of Substance Use and Addiction TreatmentVolume
160AbstractIntroduction: Hospitals are an ideal setting to stage opioid-related interventions with patients who are hospitalized due to overdose or other substance use–related complications. Transitional opioid programs—which initiate care and provide linkages upon discharge, such as screening, initiation of medications for opioid use disorder, and addiction consult services—have become the gold standard, but implementation has been uneven. The purpose of this study was to assess disparities in the availability of hospital-based transitional opioid programs, across rural and urban hospital settings in the United States. Methods: Using hospital administrative data paired with county-level demographic data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses to assess rural-urban differences in the availability of transitional opioid services including screening, addiction consult services, and MOUD in U.S general medical centers, controlling for hospital- and community-level factors. Our sample included 2846 general medical hospitals that completed the 2021 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals. Our primary outcomes were five self-reported measures: whether the hospital provided screening in the ED; provided screening in the inpatient setting; whether the hospital provided addiction consult services in the ED; provided addiction consult services in the inpatient setting; and whether the hospital provided medications for opioid use disorder. Results: Rural hospitals did not have lower odds of screening for OUD or other SUDs than urban hospitals, but both micropolitan rural counties and noncore rural counties had significantly lower odds of having addiction consult services in either the ED (OR: 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.58, 0.95; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.91) or inpatient setting (OR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.59, 0.97; OR: 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.93), respectively, or of offering MOUD (OR: 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.52, 0.90; OR: 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.37, 0.74). Conclusions: Our study suggests that evidence-based interventions, such as medications for opioid use disorder and addiction consult services, are less often available in rural hospitals, which may contribute to rural-urban disparities in health outcomes secondary to OUD. A priority for population health improvement should be developing implementation strategies to support rural hospital adoption of transitional opioid programs.The Ecology of Economic Distress and Life Expectancy