Mari Armstrong-Hough

Mari Armstrong-Hough
Associate Professor of Social & Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology
-
Professional overview
-
Dr. Mari Armstrong-Hough is Associate Professor in the Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences and in the Department of Epidemiology. She is a medical sociologist and epidemiologist of respiratory disease.
Dr. Armstrong-Hough’s global health research examines the epidemiologic interfaces among tuberculosis (TB), HIV, and non-communicable diseases. Combining training in epidemiology and sociology, her work develops and evaluates interventions to increase early case-finding, status awareness, and linkage to care in high-burden settings like Uganda and South Africa. She has published on predictors of evaluation for TB among high-risk groups, novel approaches to active case-finding for TB and HIV, the ways that providers and patients imagine and communicate risk for respiratory infection, and the availability of essential medicines in settings with double burdens of infectious and non-communicable disease. Her first book, Biomedicalization and the Practice of Culture: Globalization and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States and Japan (University of North Carolina Press, 2018), examined how the practice and experience of global evidence-based medicine is shaped by local cultural repertoires. Her recent work has appeared in the Journal of AIDS, International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, and the The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. She also co-directs the NIH-funded Mixed-Methods Fellowship of the Pulmonary Complications of AIDS Research Training Program at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. She is PI of a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary TB in Uganda and a co-investigator on NIH-funded studies of contact tracing for TB.
Dr. Armstrong-Hough’s US-based research examines racial and ethnic disparities in survival of respiratory failure and seeks to develop interventions to ensure that all patients with respiratory failure receive evidence-based care. Approximately 750,000 Americans die each year from respiratory failure, and its 2.5 million survivors experience poor physical function and quality of life persisting five years after discharge. Minority patients are significantly less likely to survive respiratory failure, with up to twice the odds of death as non-Hispanic White patients. Dr. Armstrong-Hough co-PIs the Promoting Equity via Changes In Practice for Respiratory Failure (PRECIPICE) studies, which use large-scale, multicenter data from US ICUs to identify care processes associated with inequities in survival and long-term outcomes. Early work related to these studies has been accepted to Annals of the American Thoracic Society.
Before coming to NYU, Dr. Armstrong-Hough was an Associate Research Scientist in Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases at Yale School of Public Health. She previously taught at Davidson College, Meiji University in Tokyo, and Duke University. She has conducted fieldwork in the United States, Japan, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Nepal and is a recipient of the Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust Mentored Research Award in Clinical, Health Services and Policy Research.
-
Education
-
BA, Sociology, History, and Political Science, University of Wisconsin–MadisonMA, East Asian Studies, Duke UniversityPhD, Sociology, Duke UniversityPostdoctoral MPH, Applied Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yale
-
Publications
Publications
'Something so hard': a mixed-methods study of home sputum collection for tuberculosis contact investigation in Uganda
(Re)designing interventions: Research with a commitment to equity
A user-centred implementation strategy for tuberculosis contact investigation in Uganda : protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
Katamba, A., Gupta, A. J., Turimumahoro, P., Ochom, E., Ggita, J. M., Nakasendwa, S., Nanziri, L., Musinguzi, J., Hennein, R., Sekadde, M., Hanrahan, C., Byaruhanga, R., Yoeli, E., Turyahabwe, S., Cattamanchi, A., Dowdy, D. W., Haberer, J. E., Armstrong-Hough, M., Kiwanuka, N., & Davis, J. L. (n.d.).Publication year
2023Journal title
BMC public healthVolume
23Issue
1AbstractBackground: Tuberculosis(TB) is among the leading causes of infectious death worldwide. Contact investigation is an evidence-based, World Health Organisation-endorsed intervention for timely TB diagnosis, treatment, and prevention but has not been widely and effectively implemented. Methods: We are conducting a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, hybrid Type III implementation-effectiveness trial comparing a user-centred to a standard strategy for implementing TB contact investigation in 12 healthcare facilities in Uganda. The user-centred strategy consists of several client-focused components including (1) a TB-education booklet, (2) a contact-identification algorithm, (3) an instructional sputum-collection video, and (4) a community-health-rider service to transport clients, CHWs, and sputum samples, along with several healthcare-worker-focused components, including (1) collaborative improvement meetings, (2) regular audit-and-feedback reports, and (3) a digital group-chat application designed to develop a community of practice. Sites will cross-over from the standard to the user-centred strategy in six, eight-week transition steps following a randomly determined site-pairing scheme and timeline. The primary implementation outcome is the proportion of symptomatic close contacts completing TB evaluation within 60 days of TB treatment initiation by the index person with TB. The primary clinical effectiveness outcomes are the proportion of contacts diagnosed with and initiating active TB disease treatment and the proportion initiating TB preventative therapy within 60 days. We will assess outcomes from routine source documents using intention-to-treat analyses. We will also conduct nested mixed-methods studies of implementation fidelity and context and perform cost-effectiveness and impact modelling. The Makerere School of Public Health IRB(#554), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology(#HS1720ES), and the Yale Institutional Review Board(#2000023199) approved the study and waived informed consent for the main trial implementation-effectiveness outcomes. We will submit results for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminate findings to local policymakers and representatives of affected communities. Discussion: This pragmatic, quasi-experimental implementation trial will inform efforts to find and prevent undiagnosed persons with TB in high-burden settings using contact investigation. It will also help assess the suitability of human-centred design and communities of practice for tailoring implementation strategies and sustaining evidence-based interventions in low-and-middle-income countries. Trial registration: The trial was registered(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05640648) on 16 November 2022, after the trial launch on 7 March 2022.A user-centred implementation strategy for tuberculosis contact investigation in Uganda: Protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
Armstrong-Hough, M., Katamba, A., Gupta, A. J., Turimumahoro, P., Ochom, E., Ggita, J. M., Nakasendwa, S., Nanziri, L., Musinguzi, J., Hennein, R., Sekadde, M., Hanrahan, C., Byaruhanga, R., Yoeli, E., Turyahabwe, S., Cattamanchi, A., Dowdy, D. W., Haberer, J. E., Armstrong-Hough, M., … Davis, J. L. (n.d.).Publication year
2023Journal title
Research squareAbstractTuberculosis (TB) is among the leading causes of infectious death worldwide. Contact investigation is an evidence-based, World Health Organisation-endorsed intervention for timely TB diagnosis, treatment, and prevention but has not been widely and effectively implemented. We are conducting a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, hybrid Type III implementation-effectiveness trial comparing a user-centred to a standard strategy for implementing TB contact investigation in 12 healthcare facilities in Uganda. The user-centred strategy consists of several client-focused components including 1) a TB-education booklet, 2) a contact-identification algorithm, 3) an instructional sputum-collection video, and 4) a community-health-rider service to transport clients, CHWs, and sputum samples, along with several healthcare-worker-focused components, including 1) collaborative improvement meetings, 2) regular audit-and-feedback reports, and 3) a digital group-chat application designed to develop a community of practice. Sites will cross from the standard to the user-centred strategy in six, eight-week transition steps following a randomly determined site-pairing scheme and timeline. The primary implementation outcome is the proportion of symptomatic close contacts completing TB evaluation within 60 days of TB treatment initiation by the index person with TB. The primary clinical effectiveness outcomes are the proportion of contacts diagnosed with and initiating active TB disease treatment and the proportion initiating TB preventative therapy within 60 days. We will assess outcomes from routine source documents using intention-to-treat analyses. We will also conduct nested mixed-methods studies of implementation fidelity and context and perform cost-effectiveness and impact modelling. The Makerere School of Public Health IRB (#554), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (#HS1720ES), and the Yale Institutional Review Board (#2000023199) approved the study with a waiver of informed consent for the main trial implementation-effectiveness outcomes. We will submit trial results for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminate findings to local shareholders, including policymakers and representatives of affected communities. This pragmatic, quasi-experimental implementation trial will inform efforts to find and prevent undiagnosed persons with TB in high-burden setting using contact investigation. It will help assess the suitability of human-centred design and communities of practice for tailoring implementation strategies and sustain evidence-based interventions in low-and-middle-income countries. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05640648.Adaptation and validation of perceived HIV and TB stigma scales among persons with TB
Armstrong-Hough, M., Ponticiello, M. N., Nanziri, L. M., Hennein, R., Ochom, E., Gupta, A. J., Turimumahoro, P., White, M. A., Armstrong-Hough, M., Katamba, A., Davis, J. L., & Davis, J. L. (n.d.).Publication year
2025Journal title
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung DiseaseVolume
29Issue
3Page(s)
127-134AbstractB A C K G R O U N D: Stigma is a barrier to care for people affected by TB and HIV in Uganda, where these conditions remain endemic. While scales have been adapted and validated to measure stigma among TB-affected households in Uganda, there is a need for scales that measure the experiences of persons with TB (PWTB). M E T H O D S: We adapted the Van Rie 12-item individual perspectives TB scale and 10-item individual perspectives HIV scale for use in Uganda through cross-cultural discussions with a multidisciplinary research team and four cognitive interviews with community health workers and PWTB. We then conducted a cross-sectional study administering each scale to 125 PWTB. We performed exploratory factor analysis, evaluated internal validity, and assessed convergent validity with perceived social support. R E S U L T S: Exploratory factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution for both scales, with marginal model fit (standardised root mean square residual ¼ 0.09 for TB, ¼ 0.07 for HIV). There was evidence of convergent validity through a positive correlation of the TB (r ¼ 0.22, p ¼ 0.01) and HIV stigma (r ¼ 0.22, p ¼ 0.01) scales with perceived social support. Both scales had good internal validity (Cronbach’s a ¼ 0.86 for TB, ¼ 0.87 for HIV). C O N C L U S I O N: Adapted scales to measure perceived HIV and TB stigma among PWTB in Uganda demonstrated promising psychometric properties by removing one and two items, respectively.Adapting a tobacco cessation treatment intervention and implementation strategies to enhance implementation effectiveness and clinical outcomes in the context of HIV care in Vietnam : a case study
Adapting a tobacco cessation treatment intervention and implementation strategies to enhance implementation effectiveness and clinical outcomes in the context of HIV care in Vietnam: a case study
ADHD in Japan: A sociological perspective
An adapted scale to measure perceived TB and HIV stigma during household contact investigation
An emerging syndemic of smoking and cardiopulmonary diseases in people living with HIV in Africa
An Emerging Syndemic of Smoking and Cardiopulmonary Diseases in People Living with HIV in Africa
Assessing a norming intervention to promote acceptance of HIV testing and reduce stigma during household tuberculosis contact investigation : Protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
Armstrong-Hough, M., Ggita, J., Gupta, A. J., Shelby, T., Nangendo, J., Ayen, D. O., Davis, J. L., & Katamba, A. (n.d.).Publication year
2022Journal title
BMJ openVolume
12Issue
5AbstractIntroduction HIV status awareness is important for household contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB). Home HIV testing during TB contact investigation increases HIV status awareness. Social interactions during home visits may influence perceived stigma and uptake of HIV testing. We designed an intervention to normalise and facilitate uptake of home HIV testing with five components: guided selection of first tester; prosocial invitation scripts; opt-out framing; optional sharing of decisions to test; and masking of decisions not to test. Methods and analysis We will evaluate the intervention effect in a household-randomised controlled trial. The primary aim is to assess whether contacts offered HIV testing using the norming strategy will accept HIV testing more often than those offered testing using standard strategies. Approximately 198 households will be enrolled through three public health facilities in Kampala, Uganda. Households will be randomised to receive the norming or standard strategy and visited by a community health worker (CHW) assigned to that strategy. Eligible contacts ≥15 years will be offered optional, free, home HIV testing. The primary outcome, proportion of contacts accepting HIV testing, will be assessed by CHWs and analysed using an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary outcomes will be changes in perceived HIV stigma, changes in perceived TB stigma, effects of perceived HIV stigma on HIV test uptake, effects of perceived TB stigma on HIV test uptake and proportions of first-invited contacts who accept HIV testing. Results will inform new, scalable strategies for delivering HIV testing. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee (2000024852), Makerere University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (661) and Uganda National Council on Science and Technology (HS2567). All participants, including patients and their household contacts, will provide verbal informed consent. Results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to national stakeholders, including policy-makers and representatives of affected communities. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05124665.Assessing a norming intervention to promote acceptance of HIV testing and reduce stigma during household tuberculosis contact investigation: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
Armstrong-Hough, M., Armstrong-Hough, M., Ggita, J., Gupta, A. J., Shelby, T., Nangendo, J., Ayen, D. O., Davis, J. L., & Katamba, A. (n.d.).Publication year
2022Journal title
BMJ openVolume
12Issue
5Page(s)
e061508AbstractHIV status awareness is important for household contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB). Home HIV testing during TB contact investigation increases HIV status awareness. Social interactions during home visits may influence perceived stigma and uptake of HIV testing. We designed an intervention to normalise and facilitate uptake of home HIV testing with five components: guided selection of first tester; prosocial invitation scripts; opt-out framing; optional sharing of decisions to test; and masking of decisions not to test.Associations among past trauma, post-displacement stressors, and mental health outcomes in Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh : A secondary cross-sectional analysis
Associations among past trauma, post-displacement stressors, and mental health outcomes in Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh: A secondary cross-sectional analysis
Associations Among Patient Race, Sedation Practices, and Mortality in a Large Multi-Center Registry of COVID-19 Patients
Availability, functionality and access of blood pressure machines at the points of care in public primary care facilities in Tororo district, Uganda
Biomedicalization and the practice of culture : globalization and type 2 diabetes in the United States and Japan
Brief Report: Give Me Some Time: Facilitators of and Barriers to Uptake of Home-Based HIV Testing During Household Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda
Clinical Practices Following Train-The-Trainer Trauma Course Completion in Uganda : A Parallel-Convergent Mixed-Methods Study
Clinical Practices Following Train-The-Trainer Trauma Course Completion in Uganda: A Parallel-Convergent Mixed-Methods Study
Armstrong-Hough, M., Tang, Z., Kayondo, D., Ullrich, S. J., Namugga, M., Muwanguzi, P., Klazura, G., Ozgediz, D., & Armstrong-Hough, M. (n.d.).Publication year
2023Journal title
World journal of surgeryVolume
47Issue
6Page(s)
1399-1408AbstractDespite the growth of trauma training courses worldwide, evidence for their impact on clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is sparse. We investigated trauma practices by trained providers in Uganda using clinical observation, surveys, and interviews.Communication attributes modify the anxiety risk associated with problematic social media use : Evidence from a prospective diary method study
Conformity and communal decision-making: First-tester effects on acceptance of home-based HIV counseling and testing in Uganda
Core components of a Community of Practice to improve community health worker performance : a qualitative study
Core components of a Community of Practice to improve community health worker performance: a qualitative study